
Photo of Haj Ali, an Iraqi teacher. He was held captive at the Abu Ghraib prison. His left hand is permanently paralyzed due to badly undergone treatments.
My friend Patricio Henríquez, who settled in Canada after he fled Chile due to the coup d’état led by Pinochet, is one of the best documentary filmmakers in the country. His latest film is now out, entitled Under the Hood, a Voyage into the World of Torture (French title: Sous la Cagoule, un voyage au bout de la torture). The documentary was produced by Macumba International in co-production with the NFB. It premiered at the Festival du Nouveau Cinéma, and is currently showing at the Ex-Centris. It’s a deeply moving film in terms of testimonies, and is highly accomplished on the aesthetic level as well. It brings up essential issues concerning the U.S. foreign policy agenda and the ‘war against terrorism.’ I attended the first screening at Ex-Centris, where Patricio was present and members of the audience were given the chance to say a few words. One of them was Adil Charkaoui, who is originally from Morocco and is presently under the cloud of a ‘security certificate.’ After having been in prison for a long time, he is not allowed to move around freely, and the reasons for these measures are confidential. During the discussion that proceeded the film, some people raised the question of Canada’s complicity in U.S. foreign policy and security tactics. I asked Patricio a few questions.
What was your thought process for the strategies of making this film? It’s not an easy subject matter!
Patricio Henríquez: For this type of film, since it deals with such a vast subject matter within time and History, the approach must bind together a whole array of elements: people, shooting locations, archival sources, information, etc. And even after performing a thorough research, one still doesn’t know everything there is to know when the time comes to start shooting, which limits the possibilities of defining a style. However, it had been clear to me from the beginning that the topic was to be addressed mainly through testimonies. We favoured the shots and the lighting setups that helped to emphasize the personality of the testifiers. We also decided to shoot the interviews with two cameras. One would be in constant movement, very close to the interviewees, thus exploring their corporal expressions to the maximum, while the second one would be set to take medium shots. Inevitably, many decisions regarding the style were taken during the montage, which had an effect on our predilection for orienting the graphical aspect toward the period prints as well as toward images that were mostly impressionistic and which were shot over the course of the montage.













![groupshot[1]](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3121/2504664836_c482cb5f0e.jpg)
