Documentary Field Notes and Flashpoints

Marching Grannies

All photos by Alan Auvaart (see below)

I just came back from filming the Raging Grannies in action at the protest against the CANSEC arms fair in Ottawa. It is the largest event of its kind in Canada, showcasing all the best new ways to inflict pain, cause death and create mayhem. It was held this year in Lansdowne Park inside the city limits. A protest action was organized by COAT - you can find all the information on Canada’s role in the arms trade on their web site.  Arms bazaars were banned from Ottawa twenty years ago, but because of municipal fusions this measure has to be adopted again to be valid. Needless to say there is a citizen campaign underfoot to do just that.

On the roll Granny

The Raging Grannies from several cities and Mémés déchaînées from Montreal played a major role at this protest, setting up a Peace Garden and slowing traffic in and out of the exhibition, singing their songs and getting their message across. They sang, among other songs, WAR BUSINESS (you can guess to what tune…)

THERE’S NO BUSINESS LIKE WAR BUSINESS
THE BEST BUSINESS THEY KNOW!
NEVER MIND THE HOMELESS AND THE HUNGRY
NEVER MIND THE PEOPLE WITHOUT JOBS
WAR’S A STUPID WAY TO SPEND OUR MONEY
IT JUST AIN’T FUNNY! LET’S MAKE IT STOP!

And

Tune:  Battle Hymn (Glory, Glory)

THE PROFITEERS ARE COMING HERE
AND THEY HAVE COME TO BUY
THE GADGETS THAT ARE ON DISPLAY
THAT BURN, EXPLODE AND FRY
AND ALL LAID OUT SO THEY CAN SEE
WHICH ONES THEY’D LIKE TO TRY
AT THE CANSEC TRADING SHOW.

For our shoot we had the help of some terrific Ottawa volunteers, including excellent photographer Alan Auvaart. It was his first encounter with the Grannies and he had this to say:’ The resilience of the Grannies to come out in such inclement weather to protest for what they believe in is truly amazing. I hope none of them catch colds!’  Here is his shot of the crew: myself, Martin Duckworth (on camera with assistant Kendall McQueen).

Part of the crew: Magnus Isacsson, Kendall McQueen, and Martin Duckworth

Still from the film ‘Final Offer’ directed by Sturla Gunnarsson

I recently had the opportunity to co-direct a 25-minute video for the Canadian Auto Workers with my wife Jocelyne Clarke. This is one of the very few commissioned pieces I have worked on in my 30 years of doing audiovisual work, but the Auto Workers is one organization I am pleased to work with. Not only does that union have a strong commitment to social justice, but it knows how to use film and video for educational purposes. The leadership of the union has also over the years shown an extraordinary openness to documentary filmmakers, not being afraid of letting them film life as it really was. This is evident in Sturla Gunnarson’s excellent 1984 film Final Offer (NFB) which documented not just an important strike but the birth of the CAW as a Canadian Union, breaking off from the ‘international’ (US dominated) UAW. Another example is Barry Greenwald’s terrific film The Negotiator (Barna-Alper 1995) which followed CAW president ‘Buzz’ Hargrove through some very difficult negotiations. (Barna-Alper and Real to Reel productions have done many videos for the CAW.) And in Quebec, Louise Lemelin and Hélène Pichette made the excellent Troc Made in Quebec which documented the fight against the closing of the Kenworth plant in Ste-Thérèse for Radio-Canada. I had an opportunity to talk to former CAW president Bob White, the main character of Final Offer, about the union’s attitude towards documentaries. If everyone shared his opinions, we would have an easier time making films ! Video below the photo.

Interviewing Bob White, President of the Canadian Auto Workers

Thanks to Jorge Bustos-Estefan for help with this blog.

An image from Helene Klodawsky’s documentary ‘Malls R Us’

Last week I had a chance to see Malls R Us, an excellent new documentary by an excellent Montreal filmmaker, Helene Klodawsky. Helene has made some terrific films, my favourite being No More Tears Sister, a story from Sri Lanka which beautifully illustrates the notion that ‘the personal is political.’ Not in a didactic or sloganeering kind of way, but just by telling a personal story set in the context of civil war and exile. One of the most interesting things about that film is the way colour has been manipulated through chemical treatment of the actual film stock.

Here’s a trailer for Malls R Us.

Malls R Us (produced by Ina Fichman of Instinct Films and Luc Martin-Glousset of Point du Jour) is about shopping malls, and the film gets inside the malls, from North America to Dubai, India and Japan, in every conceivable way. Rather than standing on the outside looking in – or spitting at them for that matter – the film takes us inside the mall not just physically but mentally, inside the heads of the people who conceive, design and build malls as well as the people who use them. One way Helene does that is by interviewing an impressive cast of key characters (kudos for convincing them), the other is by capturing some revealing conversations in the mall context. The film is also very thoughtful, about the deeper meaning of the prevalence of malls. Are they the cathedrals of modern times or – as author Ray Bradbury suggests in the film – today’s version of the town square? Or are they monuments to an era dominated by consumerism to the detriment of higher values? In her narration Helene takes care not to hit us over the head with any ready-made conclusions, which actually makes the film scarier, in a deeper and more subtle way. I asked Helene to talk about her creative process and editorial choices.

Helene Klodawsky

In 2006, while editing Family Motel (an alternative fiction film on a Somali refugee family’s journey into homelessness), I read the initial research on a new project being developed by Instinct Films. Writer Harold Crooks and researcher Terri Foxman were working closely with producer Ina Fichman on her idea about the global spread of shopping malls. I soon signed onto the project as director. Right from the start, there were many challenges as the film had been developed and sold as an international coproduction with many themes, contrasts, characters and locations. I needed to find a way to tell the 70-year-old story of these huge temples to consumerism, describe why malls hold such appeal for the billions of people who visit them, as well as provide a critique of their worldwide proliferation. Added to this was the complexity of getting into to malls to shoot. Think of gaining access to a prison; most of the time it was that difficult, and hence we were extremely limited in what and when we could shoot.

Early on I decided to focus on characters that were intensely involved in the world of malls – whether out of passion or despair – rather than intellectuals or social critics who observed malls only from a distance.  I felt it was important that my intended audience (those who both adore and despise shopping centres) listen directly to those people who are fully committed to bringing malls to every corner of the globe. I knew I would have only a few days in each location and hence decided to construct a highly stylized post-modern collage made up of mini portraits of each character alongside malls that represented an issue or struggle. Wherever we shot I was surprised by what we found. For example, who would have thought that Science Fiction guru Ray Bradbury would be a proponent of malls, or that young men travel the US mourning the loss of once thriving, but now dead, malls?  I am most proud of capturing the little known anti-mall protests in India – as in most of the world, mall developments seems to be a done deal, quietly accepted by most of the population. Audiences tell me how much they appreciate the complex reading that Malls R Us provides – waking us up to ways in which culture and the environment are being shaped by the everyday places that dot our cities and suburbs.

An image from Lech Kowalski’s ‘Hey! Is Dee Dee Home?’

Last week I saw the most creatively radical documentary I have ever seen, East of Paradise (2004) by Lech Kowalski. It breaks every convention of story development. The first half of the film is made up of an interview with Kowalski’s mother, about the horrors she experienced as a young girl at the end of the Second World War, in Russian-occupied Poland. Then he cuts to a medley of his own films of junkies on the New York underground scene, filmed over the last couple of decades. And what’s the link? The extreme.  That becomes clear in the film, towards the end. Kowalski was here in Montreal for a retrospective of his films at the Cinémathèque Québecoise and had a chance to elaborate. To Kowalski life is real when you’re at the extreme limits of what can be tolerated, and that is what throws light on the rest of our existence. He explained how the horrors his mother had experienced set a sort of standard against which, it seemed, all his own experiences had to be measured. This led him to search out, in his own life and work, some extremely harsh realities.  So in a sense, the totally unorthodox structure of his film was totally logical. At the discussion after the film the son of a holocaust victim talked about how he totally identified with this psychological dilemma, and brought up the question of a ’survival gene.’ Kowalski totally agreed, he had received that also from his parents. After all they had been through to survive, he would not have the right to waste his own life, to become one of those junkies you see dying of overdose or AIDS in his own films.

Lech Kowalski (Photo Jocelyne Clarke)

Kowalski believes that we are in a ‘post-documentary era’ where reality is too complex to be dealt with in an ordinary film, especially since film production and distribution are largely controlled by vested interests who are set against free creativity and analysis. He has created a web site called Camera War TV to create a new kind of documentary experience. I think this is a great concept, even though I found some of the films on the site less than impressive.

A fascinating encounter.  And during the coming month we will have the time to see more of Kowalski’s films. D.O.A.: A Right of Passage (1980), Born to Lose: The Last Rock and Roll Movie (1999), Gringo: The Story of a Junkie (1987), Rock Soup (1991) and two films on Eastern Europe: The Boot Factory (2000) and On Hitler’s Highway (2002).

There is an excellent interview with Kowalski [in French] on the Cinémathèque’s web site.

P.S. I am sure you saw the British clip on YouTube about Susan Boyle, the ‘unattractive’ woman singer whose performance brings down the house in a resounding victory over prejudice (represented by the attitudes of a talent-show jury). A wonderful little film with important issues, suspense, a terrific main character, excellent character development, a surprising turn-around, an uplifting outcome, reminiscent of classical stories like the ugly duckling and Cinderella. What more can you ask of a doc?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lp0IWv8QZY

Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in shapes of your own choosing…If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.

George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-four, 1949

A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.

Aldous Huxley, Introduction to the reprint of Brave New World, 1945

Two terrifying novels haunted the 20th Century and continue to trouble us today: Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four and Huxley’s Brave New World.  Every day, newspapers invoke their nightmarish visions, whether driven by Orwell’s ‘Big Brother’ repression or Huxley’s consumer seduction and conditioning.

Several generations of readers have used these two novels as beacons, throwing light on contemporary realities. Young people still read them today, and use them to make sense of what’s going on in the world. Orwell and Huxley could never have imagined some of the amazing technological advances of the last few decade. But they understood the fundamental tendencies at work in modern society, and that’s why they are still read today.

Orwell foresaw surveillance, repression, constant war and torture. Huxley imagined rampant commercialism, deception, conditioning and genetic manipulation. Today, unfortunately, many of  the daily realities we and people around the world experience  combine the ‘Orwellian’ with the ‘Huxleyan.’ Our willing participation in the invasion of our own privacy through our use of Facebook and other social sites on the web is just one recent example.

There is a time-honoured tradition of debate about which one of the two authors, Orwell or Huxley, was more prescient. In the end, authors like Margaret Atwood have concluded that the main issue isn’t ‘who was right,’ but in what ways both authors were right – and what we can learn from using their insights. This is also our view.

For several years now, Varda Burstyn and myself have been working on a film about these issues. However, the subject seemed too large and sprawling to really make a good film, and the most enthusiasm for this project comes from young people who are most interested in participatory, interactive web-based experiences. The project has now found a home on the NFB’s web site Citizenshift. Check it out, comment, contribute!

http://citizen.nfb.ca/brave-new-1984

If they came back to life, Orwell and Huxley would feel vindicated for many of the dystopian trends they foresaw. At the same time, they might well be surprised – and delighted - to see the amount of resistance to these trends, all over the world.  Huxley called for caution, for vigilance and for a greater awareness of the potential totalitarian power of scientific and technological innovation. Orwell called for a mobilization of the common people against power and privilege sustained by repression and elite omnipotence. These concerns are echoed in many civil society movements today.

That is why we think this project has a great deal of potential to capture the imagination of video makers and web users.

Annie Roy and Pierre Allard of ATSA with one component of their installation at the Havana Biennial
Annie Roy et Pierre Allard de ATSA avec une partie de leur installation à la Biennale de La Havane

[Français plus bas]

With my close collaborator Simon Bujold, I am just back from Cuba, where we were filming the artists Annie Roy and Pierre Allard of ATSA as they participated in the 10th Havana Biennial. The theme of the event is Integration and Resistance in a Global World. Annie and Pierre made an installation called Cannonballs and Bubblegum, a way of speaking about the repressive and destructive aspects of consumer culture - a kind of warning to people who live in a context of shortages but whose society might well experience huge changes in the decades to come.  This was one of the last shoots for our film Creative Emergency (working title) produced by Amazone Film, already in editing and likely to be released before the end of the year.

Avec mon complice Simon Bujold, je suis tout juste de retour de Cuba, ou nous avons filmé Annie Roy et Pierre Allard de ATSA participant à la 10e Biennale de La Havane. Le thème de l’exposition est Intérgration et Résistance à l’époque de la mondialisation. Pierre et Annie sont venus faire une installation qui s’appelle Boules de canon et gum-balloune, façon de parler des dimensions répressives et destructrices de la société de consommation, sorte d’avertissement pour un pays qui vit la pénurie mais qui risque de vivre des changements importants au cours des prochaines décennies. C’était un de nos derniers tournages pour notre film Urgence Création (titre de travai) produit par Amazone Film - nous sommes déjà en montage, le film devrait sortit avant la fin de l’année.

Manifestation en août 2006, réclamant que Exxon nettoie les plages et qu’il paie pour les dommages.

Un des meilleurs films que j’avais vu aux Rencontres Internationales du Documentaire de Montréal au mois de novembre sera aussi présenté cette semaine au Festival des Films sur les Droits, aussi à Montréal, et sera également diffusé à Radio-Canada la semaine prochaine. Le film est le produit d’un travail d’enquête de longue haleine, réalisé par Robert Cornellier dans le cadre de l’excellente maison de production Macumba International - dont je vous reparlerai au cours des prochaines semaines. Black Wave raconte la choquante histoire de l’impact environnemental dévastateur de l’accident du pétrolier Exxon Valdez en Alaska et la lutte des communautés affectés pour des réparations et une compensation adéquate. Je me suis entretenu avec Robert Cornellier.

Cette histoire est choquante. A-t-elle été bien couverte par les médias ? Aux États-Unis notamment ?

Il y a eu une grande couverture médiatique au moment de la catastrophe en 1989.  Des journalistes et des caméras du monde entier se sont rendus sur les lieux pendant quelques mois. Puis cette histoire est tombée, peu à peu, dans l’oubli. Il y a eu un regain d’attention, principalement en Alaska, au moment du 10e anniversaire. Quelques bons articles faisant un bilan des conséquences ont été publiés. Puis c’est tombé dans l’oubli. J’ai commencé à couvrir cette histoire en 2004, lors du 15e anniversaire. Riki Ott et un groupe de citoyens de Cordova ont alors organisé une conférence de presse et quelques événements à Washington DC pour attirer l’attention sur leur cause, mais il n’y a pratiquemment pas eu de couverture. À peine quelques lignes provenant d’agences de presse. Finalement il y a eu une petite attention apportée par les médias lorsque la cause a été entendue à la Cour Suprême. Mais aucun papier d’analyse ou reportage de fond sur cette question. Pourtant les conséquences de ce jugement sont très importantes pour l‚avenir. Les citoyens américains viennent, ni plus ni moins, de perdre toute forme recours contre les compagnies pétrolières en cas de déversement pétrolier.

J’ai beaucoup aimé le film, seulement j’avais l’impression qu’on racontait beaucoup des événements du passé plutôt que de les vivre au moment ou les choses se passaient. Les événements se sont déroulés sur quelle période, et tu as tourné sur quelle période ?

J’ai commencé à travailler sur cette histoire en janvier 2004. La catastrophe datait déjà d’il y a 15 ans.  À Cordova, le village de pêcheurs où nous avons tourné, les gens ne voulaient plus parler de cette histoire. Ils voulaient simplement reprendre leur vie en main et tourner la page sur le passé. Et la saga judiciaire était rendu au niveau de la Cour d’Appel (9th Circuit Court), et traînait depuis plusieurs années. La difficulté qui s’est posé, c‚est qu’il ne se passait pas grand chose. Le tournage de Black Wave a débuté en août 2006 avec la manifestation de bateaux juste en face du village. Ce fut la seule qu’il y a eu au cours des deux années du tournage. J’ai été constamment à l’affût d’événements. J’ai fait une douzaine de voyages en Alaska. Nous sommes allés pour le carnaval, pour la fête du 4 juillet. À chaque fois que j’apprenais que quelque chose allait se dérouler dans le village ou ailleurs, je m’y rendais. Il faut dire aussi, que du mois d’avril jusqu’au mois de septembre, toute la vie s’articule autour de la pêche. Le village est alors très tranquille. Puis au cours de l’hiver, une grande partie du village se vide, parce que beaucoup de pêcheurs et leur famille vivent ailleurs où ils gagnent leur vie parce qu’à Cordova il n’y a rien. Ce fut donc un réel défi de parler de cette histoire et d’essayer de la rendre vivante, parce qu’il ne se passait pas grand chose.Comme il y a eu beaucoup de déplacements, il fallait aussi faire des choix pour essayer de garder les coûts de production le plus bas possible. Il y a une partie du tournage où j’étais seul, c’est-à-dire que je réalisais, faisait la caméra et le son.  Au cours de ce tournage j’ai réalisé à quel point c’est difficile de parler d’événements qui se sont déroulés dans un passé récent mais qui ne sont plus dans l’actualité, tout en essayant de les rendre le plus vivant possible.

Equipe: Une partie de l’équipe de tournage à Cordova: de la gauche: Robert Vanherweghem, dir. photo; Riki Ott; Paul Carvalho, co-producteur et scénariste; Robert Cornellier, réalisateur et co-producteur.

J’étais invité à l’ouverture du 4ème Festival de Films sur les Droits de la Personne de Montréal il y a quelques jours mais je n’ai pas pu y aller. Mon proche collaborateur Franck Le Coroller s’y est rendu à ma place et nous fait le résumé suivant.

Affiche du film 8

La salle était pleine à craquer. On aurait pu s’attendre à voir un documentaire en film d’ouverture, genre de prédilection pour l’engagement et la justice sociale mais c’est une compilation de 7 courts métrages de fiction et d’un documentaire qui était à l’honneur.

Les Objectifs du Millénaire pour le Développement (OMD) : un plan clair qui s’est probablement effacé peu à peu de notre mémoire. Voilà déjà 9 ans que 191 gouvernements ont adopté officiellement un plan visant à éliminer la pauvreté dans le monde d’ici 2015. LDM Productions a eu la fabuleuse idée de convoquer 8 réalisateurs de renom et leur a laissé carte blanche pour traiter chacun d’un de ces 8 objectifs. Ce film s’adresse à tout un chacun mais vise surtout à rappeler aux gouvernements leur engagement vis-à-vis des plus démunis de notre planète. À mi-parcours, les objectifs paraissent malheureusement bien loin.

Une magnifique séquence d’ouverture nous rappelle les étapes ayant mené à l’adoption de ce plan depuis la seconde guerre mondiale avec notamment la transformation de la Société des Nations en l’ONU et la dégradation accélérée de la condition humaine de par le globe. Des images d’archives des dirigeants de ce monde sont projetées sur un corps maigre et nu. Le ton est donné : ce film vous rentre dans le corps.

La plupart des courts métrages, tournés un peu partout sur la planète, abordent leur objectif à travers le portrait d’une personne. Le journal d’une petite fille, le rêve d’une autre, les pensées d’un petit garçon, la maladie d’un homme, le sort d’une femme enceinte prennent le singulier pour parler d’un universalisme à résoudre. On est pris aux tripes dans les histoires de ces personnes. Un sens de la réalité sait effacer toute trace de misérabilisme. Ces petits moments magiques qui nous accrochent dans un documentaire sont habilement et subtilement mis en scène. Le documentaire c’est « le traitement créatif de la réalité », nous disait John Grierson, ne serait-ce pas valable aussi pour la fiction engagée?

Dans SIDA, le seul documentaire, Gaspar Noé nous emmène dans cette maladie et toutes celles qu’elle convie. Le traitement visuel épuré (un enchaînement quasi total de plans fixes, la nuit) met l’accent sur la voix off de l’homme que nous voyons, seul. Tout comme dans Irréversible, rien n’est épargné. La réalité brutale de cet homme nous contant son histoire est hypnotisante : ses maux, son combat, ses conseils, ses regrets et sa solitude n’ont d’égale que la triste puissance de ce virus dont la propagation doit être enrayée au plus vite, ne l’oublions pas.

8 met aussi en lumière les rapports Nord-Sud, cruciaux pour améliorer le sort de tous. Dans Le rêve de Tiya d’Abderrahmane Sissako, l’instituteur demande à Tiya pourquoi elle ne dit pas plus fort le premier objectif du millénaire qu’est la réduction de la faim et de l’extrême pauvreté. Tiya répond : « Parce que je n’y crois pas. La réduction de la pauvreté, ça passe par le partage et on ne partage pas. » Un rappel urgent et efficace. Wim Wenders dans Person To Person termine le film avec une salle d’information cynique prise d’assaut par ceux qui ont des solutions, continuant ainsi la vague d’espoir et d’engagement indispensable pour aller de l’avant. Les sujets de l’information sortent des écrans de montage et refusent qu’on ne les voit que dans la misère. Ils agissent déjà (par le micro-crédit entre autres) et convient les médias occidentaux à les suivre. C’est une superbe pirouette cinématographique de Wim Wenders pour exprimer le besoin de partenariat Nord-Sud.

Certains verront peut-être dans 8 un film de propagande mais il fait surtout l’état des lieux sur une situation qui nous concerne tous. On ne peut pas rester indifférent à notre sort commun. Et s’il y a une promesse que nos gouvernements devraient tenir, c’est bien celle-là, surtout en contexte de récession mondiale.

Depuis 2000, le gouvernement du Canada a réduit sa participation financière vouée aux Objectifs du Millénaire pour le Développement alors qu’il avait promis de l’augmenter jusqu’à 0,7 % de son PIB.

8 [site officiel du film]
Festival de Films sur les Droits de la Personne de Montréal [site officiel]

I am screening a ton of rushes, not much time for writing. But I thought I’d pass on a couple of interesting links.

An image from the documentary ‘The Age of Stupid’

First, about the ‘crowd-funded’ documentary The Age of Stupid, by British documentarian Director Franny Armstrong and Producer Lizzie Gillett. Film completed, their aim over the coming months is to “turn 250 million viewers into activists, all focused on the UN Climate Summit in Copenhagen, December 2009
where the successor to the Kyoto Treaty must be finalized.”

I am familiar with Armstrong’s previous work, because she was one of the co-directors of McLibel, about the young activists in the U.K. who sued McDonald’s. During the same period, I made two films about attempts to unionize McDonald’s in Quebec (see my web site) and of course Morgan Spurlock made Super Size Me.

Making-of film (50 minutes) [here]

Article [here]

(Thanks to Mark Hamilton and the Doc list serve.)

A frame from ‘Slumdog Millionaire’

And now for some fiction, both acclaimed and controversial. Slumdog Millionaire is without any question the most successful film of the year, taking home numerous Oscars, including best film, Golden Globe award in the same category. It’s such a household word by now, I won’t describe it. Personally I liked it a lot, for its clever structure and great camerawork and editing. But I have close friends who are documentary filmmakers from Bombay, and they were not so thrilled. The sent me the following articles:

Mitu Sengupta: “Slumdog Millionaire: a Hollow Message of Social Justice” [here]

Jeremy Seabrook: “Betraying India’s poor” [here]

Aarundhati Roy: “Caught on Film: India ‘not shining’” [here]

(Thanks to Ali Kazimi and Anand Patwardhan.)

Barack Obama, Michaëlle Jean, and Jean-Daniel Lafond

‘Cinéaste frustré, philosophe comblé.‘ (’Frustrated filmmaker, fulfilled philosopher.’)

Following up on my post from last week, here’s part two of my interview with Jean-Daniel Lafond.  How has he adapted to his newest role as “His Excellency” and a very active partner to Canada’s Governor General, Michaëlle Jean?
[Video interview clip further down.]

Of his current circumstances, Jean-Daniel says, “The challenge is to remain oneself and to defend the values one has always defended.  There is a space for that.”  His position is of a volunteer with an official status. He jokes that Canadians are getting “two for the price of one” and professes total solidarity with Michaëlle.

In his official capacity, Jean-Daniel has made culture his bailiwick, and suggests perhaps it is sorely in need of being defended in this country. It is critical to demonstrate the importance of culture, not just complain about lack of support, he says. He has created Point des arts/Art Matters, a forum and network for reflection and debate about artistic matters from all disciplines, bringing together practitioners, theorists and arts administrators of all political stripes. He has initiated the internet site Citizen Voices/Écoute des citoyens in an attempt to make the office of the Governor General more relevant and accessible, particularly to Canadian youth.

About making films, Jean-Daniel says he finds himself constantly in unexpected and extraordinary circumstances, for example in private conversation with heads of state, and in a most privileged position to observe the world, governance, diplomacy, the very highest echelons of power. He finds it simultaneously stimulating and frustrating. Given the opportunity, he would be making films all the time, but contents himself with gathering as much information - and some video material - as possible, building blocks or sources of inspiration for future projects.

Thanks to Jocelyne Clarke and Jorge Bustos-Estefan for help with this blog.