Sexy concrete – documentary theatre

SexyBeton2011
France Roland and Maude Laurendeau-Mondoux in 'Sexy béton'.

Last week I went to see a terrific documentary play called SEXY BÉTON, or “sexy concrete”. It was created by Annabel Soutar of the Porte Parole theatre company in Montreal – only the last in a series of documentary theatre performances.

And this truly is a documentary ‘démarche’ – to use this excellent French word which means a way of proceeding, an approach which involves a particular method. It’s an investigation of the cave-in of a concrete overpass that killed five people and seriously injured six others in Laval, just north of Montreal in 2006.

Annabel and her colleagues create a performance which is a hybrid of a documentary film shoot, a journalistic investigation and participatory research. They have a big advantage in that they don’t represent a media organization and they don’t have to bring a camera when they go to meet people. They record audio, and then use excerpts of people’s statements or dialogue to construct their play. People don’t have their guards up the way they would with a more elaborate or more journalistic setup.

What we learn from the play is revealing, shocking and thought-provoking. To sum it all up, this is a tragedy for which no one takes responsibility. The engineers, the construction companies, the sub-contractors, the civil servants working for the Department of Transport – no one wants to fess up to any wrongdoing or negligence.

To Annabel and her co-conspirators this case is a metaphor for the general state of affairs in our society. A lot is going wrong, catastrophically wrong, but no one is responsible. This is an important point.

And, in addition, the play seems incredibly timely in the present Québec context. The action takes place in Laval – Quebec’s second largest city – where municipal corruption is just now the subject of frequent scandals. And it deals with the construction industry, at a moment where a majority of Quebecers would like to see an official inquiry into corruption and wrongdoings in this sector. (Radio-Canada’s excellent investigative show Enquête should be credited with most of the revelations on these subjects.)

In creating this play, Annabel and her colleagues decided to do more than investigate. They attempted to convince the surviving victims to go for a lawsuit. Ignoring the advice from high-profile lawyer Julius Grey not to push the victims, they try hard but fail, and (though one might disagree with what they are doing) this is an important and interesting part of the story.

In watching the excellent crew of actors perform the interaction between the victims and with the documentarians, I felt like I was completely reliving my experience with the innocent victims of organized crime who were the subject of my film Hellbent for Justice (‘Pendant que court l’Assassin’.)

In both cases, the victims were completely unprepared for the complex physical, psychological and legal realities they suddenly had to deal with. And in both cases they have to confront bureaucratic machineries which don’t take their real-life situation into account.

The mise en scène (designed by Sophie Vajda and André Perrier) is great, the actors are fantastic, and completely bilingual. Watching this play is a truly Montreal experience of the best kind.

The play is still on until Feb 26. I am asking Annabel Soutar a few questions and will publish them in the coming weeks.

Thanks to Tobi Elliott for her help with this blog.

HD for Dummies

Philippe Lavallette - les réfugiés de la planète bleue
DOP Philippe Lavallette at work with an HD camera on Les réfugiés de la planète bleue.

These days, most documentaries are shot in HD, high definition. Seems to make sense, doesn’t it, since you can buy a high definition camera for just a thousand dollars! But does this mean that all HD is one and the same thing, and that you get as good an image with a thousand-dollar camera as with one that costs 50 times more? You guessed it, you don’t.

A few weeks ago I had the privilege of taking a course in HD workflow at PRIM, in Montreal, a resource centre for artists and filmmakers. (I am a member, we did the post-production for my most recent films there.) It was an opportunity to get an answer to my most pressing question: what does HD really mean, how do you know what quality you are really getting, and can you combine different kinds of HD formats without noticeable quality differences ?

So, in case you were asking the same question, here’s a short summary answer. The quality of a digital image is partly, but only partly, defined by the resolution, measured in lines of pixels. Standard Definition (SD) has 480 horizontal lines. The most common HD resolution is 1080 (horizontal) x 1920 (vertical) lines for a 16:9 image, but can be lower (720 for the vertical count is common) or higher (up to 4000 for a camera like the RED).

However, the actual quality of the image doesn’t depend only on the resolution. It also is a direct function of the compression, the size and nature of the image sensor, and the quality of the lens.

Compression is a way to encode the information to save space on whatever support the image is recorded on. It is expressed in three-part a formula as in 4:4:4 (uncompressed) or 4:2:2 (a $5,000 prosumer camera like the EX-1 which I use.) The inevitable cost of compression is a loss of definition and detail, and reduced margins for colour correction and visual effects in post production.

And the sensor. The smaller the sensor, the less detail you will get, and– counter-intuitively– the more depth of field you will get. More depth of field might sound like a good thing to the neophyte, but actually film makers tend to want the opposite, to achieve more of a ‘film look.’ (Main subject in focus, background out of focus, for ex.) Both Sony and Panasonic are just coming out with cameras that will make it possible to shoot video with a very limited depth of field, that will be another small revolution in video production.

With the help of PRIM’s excellent staff, we did some tests with the different cameras I use. To summarize the conclusion: the small and cheap HD cameras give a surprisingly good result, but you don’t get the same quality image as with a more expensive one. If you want to combine to two, the smaller/cheaper cameras should be used in good lighting conditions.

Thanks to Tobi Elliott for help with this post.

Salut Ti-Guy!

Commémoration Guy Tremblay
This past weekend I attended a memorial service for Guy Tremblay, a sometimes-homeless singer and volunteer worker affectionately known as ‘Ti-Guy’ in the shelters and soup kitchens in downtown Montreal.

The service, at the Notre Dame des Lourdes chapel on St. Catherine street East was warm and unpretentious, marked by the social context of an area that has a lot of marginalized people. The testimonies to Guy were touching, describing him very candidly as a sometimes-manipulative guy with addiction problems, but sensitive, generous and talented.

Guy was one of the main characters in my film Les Enfants de Choeur/The Choir Boys, about Montreal’s homeless choir, La Chorale de l’Accueil Bonneau, released about ten years ago. My terrific editor Louise Côté really liked Guy, and all his good and not-so-good sides were much in evidence in the film. People sometimes ask me – with a critical tone in their voice – why I included a scene were Guy, under the influence, pointedly tells me “Magnus, if you film me now I will…” He didn’t say #*$#@#, but it’s clear what he meant. Well, we showed him the fine cut, and he graciously accepted it without requesting any changes.

Guy was 47 when he died, one week after participating in his last concert. The homeless choir has come back to life, under the name ‘La Chorale sous les étoiles,’ the Choir under the Stars. They sang at the service – not a funeral, because Ti-Guy had been buried already in his hometown of St. Siméon.

The producer of ‘Les Enfants de Choeur’, Paul Lapointe, as well as the editor Louise Côté and DOP’s Martin Duckworth, Andrei Khabad and François Beauchemin join me in saying: Salut Ti-Guy, you enriched our lives and we are grateful for it.

Thanks to Tobi Elliott for her help with this blog.

Premières vues et ‘Chercher le courant’

Si vous lisez mon bloque régulièrement, vous avez probablement remarqué que je ne critique que très rarement le travail d’autres documentaristes. Mais j’ai été invité récemment à participer à une discussion à l’émission Premières Vues, diffusé sur Canal Vox, la télévision communautaire de Vidéotron/Québecor.

Après avoir parlé de ma propre démarche, j’ai discuté du film ‘Chercher le Courant’ avec les deux réalisateurs Nicolas Boisclair et Alexis de Gheldère. Le film est construit autour de leur descente de la rivière La Romaine en 2008, l’année avant que commençait le harnachement de celle-ci par Hydro-Québec.

Le voyage est entrecoupé de scènes d’une enquête systématique sur les alternatives énergétiques plus vertes qui ne détruisent pas des rivières et qui ne créent pas ou peu de gaz à effet de serre – menée d’ailleurs par le comédien Roy Dupuis. Et comme le but de l’exercice était de discuter du film, j’ai du exprimer mon point de vue.

D’abord, j’ai tenu à féliciter les deux cinéastes pour leur sens de l’initiative et leur courage. Non seulement ils ont entrepris une expédition de 700 km en canot sur une rivière difficile – de sa source au Labrador jusqu’à l’embouchure dans le St. Laurent. Ils ont en plus réussi à réaliser un film très ambitieux et substantiel malgré un contexte très difficile et un financement nettement insuffisant. Étant moi-même kayakiste de rivières et documentariste, je suis en mesure d’apprécier l’ampleur des défis qu’ils ont relevé. Comme premier film, c’est impressionnant.

Alors chapeau! – au producteur Denis McCready et les Films du Rapide Blanc aussi.

Premières vues - Chercher le courant
MI, Nicolas Boisclair, Frédéric Corbet et Alexis de Gheldère.

Par contre, dans l’émission – qui sera diffusée cette semaine – j’exprime aussi des critiques par rapport au film. Pour moi, l’histoire dramatique qui aurait pu être bien plus développée était justement la descente de la rivière, avec ses multiples embûches et rebondissements. Il fallait juste le dire pour que les deux cinéastes se mettent à raconter plein de dimensions de cette aventure qui ne sont pas dans le film. Ils ont voulu faire un film plus didactique, parce que leur mission en était une d’éducation populaire sur les choix énergétiques. A mon sens la qualité du film en tant que film se trouve à en souffrir.

C’est un choix très différent de celui que j’avais fait en réalisant Power (Tension) sur la campagne des Cris pour sauver la Rivière Grande Baleine au début des années 1990. Pour moi, il faut avant tout raconter une histoire captivante de manière cinématographique, plutôt que d’inclure toutes les informations et analyses dans le film. Ceci dit, j’ai déjà fait des films plus didactiques et dénonciateurs moi-même.

Et…. ‘Chercher le Courant’ est un excellent outil d’éducation, certainement un film à voir pour mieux comprendre nos options énergétiques.

L’émission Premières vues est animé de façon très dynamique par Fréderic Corbet. Elle sera diffusée jeudi à 19.30 avec de multiples reprises au cours des jours suivants.

Merci a Tobi Elliott pour l’aide avec le blog.

‘Inside Disaster’: the Interactive Experience

Inside disaster screenshot-12

Last week I wrote about the terrific Inside Disaster series. And here, as promised, is my colleague Tobi Elliott’s assessment of the interactive game on the Inside Disaster web site, where you can choose to be a survivor, a relief worker, or a journalist. (Tobi, as you may have noticed, regularly helps with this blog.)

Greeted by a grim, ashy looking scene of destruction, I begin the “Inside the Haiti Earthquake” experience with a small amount of dread. The disclaimer reads: “Please note that this simulation contains graphic and disturbing imagery.”

Many of the images ARE disturbing. Graphic and heartwrenching. Bodies lying in heaps on the ground. Rioting for food, people getting trampled. Fires and tears and brokenness. Some clips are more vivid than others, but the grainy film texture sometimes adds to the chaos the experience is supposed to replicate. Music underscores many of the clips.

I chose to enter the experience as a journalist, of course, and my job was to create a two-minute feature story on the earthquake for a major network. After arriving in Haiti and travelling to Port-au-Prince, I was given the choice to go out into the streets and film, or stay in the safety of the Canadian Embassy. I chose to go out and get a story.

Following most segments, the player is presented with options to select from, choices that affect the outcome of your story. Some of the introductions/transitions to the next segment are almost hilarious, like a vibrating Blackberry cellphone with a text message from your producer after you file your first story.

Inside disaster screenshot-7
Your choices can lead to harsh, seemingly realistic outcomes, as I discovered when I lost my job after making a poor choice as a journalist! (I decided on a story angle too soon and couldn’t deliver… hmm…)

Generally, I found the experience quite moving because it brought me right into the reality of chaotic post-earthquake Haiti. I forgot sometimes that I was playing “a game.” What was onscreen could believably become what you might see with your own eyes. It became real. Your choices do seem to matter, even if just for a split second, “inside disaster.”

This simulation would probably appeal to almost any age, except for young children, and seems more designed to rouse empathy than to educate. The choices you make can lead to good and bad consequences, but that doesn’t seem to be the point of the experience. Instead, it’s about experiencing the chaos and trauma in a situation like the aftermath of Haiti’s earthquake… where every decision isn’t necessarily a good one, just the best one that could be made at the time.

Check it out here and see for yourself: www.insidedisaster.com/experience.

Inside disaster screenshot-5

Thanks to Tobi Elliott for her help with this blog. You can find her at her new website here.

‘Inside Disaster’ really delivers

Gedan's daughter, Cite Soleil, Haiti

It is a year since the devastating earthquake in Haiti, and just about every generalist television network has been broadcasting special programming. I found most of it to be competently done and well-meaning, but extremely predictable and pretty superficial.

This is the curse of television. Just wait till the 10th anniversary of September 11th later this year. Millions of dollars will be spent on reporters and television crews lining up to broadcast from Ground Zero, and I could tell you already what they will say. Meanwhile, how much coverage is there of the millions of people who have perished in Congo over the last five years?

Fortunately, for this earthquake anniversary, there were a few exceptions from the run-of-the-mill. Radio-Canada’s news channel RDI broadcast a documentary by Réal Barnabé and Dominique Morisette who had gone back to meet the people and places featured in Radio-Canada’s first ever reportage from Haiti (done by the grand dame of Quebec télévision journalism, Judith Jasmin). Pourquoi Haiti? became Pourquoi pas Haiti? (Why Not Haiti?) and it was interesting to see that some of today’s key players on the country’s political scene were already active back then.

Frontline (PBS) showed an interesting look at the policing situation in Port-au-Prince, where the criminals who escaped the crumbling prisons in the aftermath of the quake have taken refuge in the emergency tent camps where they are rebuilding their gangs and taking control.

But the best programs are broadcast on TVO: the series Inside Disaster, directed by Nadine Pequenza and produced by Andrea Nemtin and Ian Dunbar at PTV productions in Toronto. I already congratulated them on their sense of initiative a year ago and I am very happy to see that they have really delivered. The authors of the series have also wisely decided to look beyond the disaster towards the long-term challenges of reconstruction – we haven’t seen that part yet.

Paul Adlaf - sound
Shooting 'Inside Disaster'
Nadine's ear phone
Dir. Nadine Pequenza

This is terrific documentary work, not just news reporting. We are truly inside the biggest humanitarian relief effort ever, focusing on the Red Cross and some really great characters Jean-Pierre Taschereau who leads the huge team is just one of them – as they struggle against overwhelming odds to get water, food and medical help to the victims of the quake. You are really there with them, experiencing their challenges, difficulties and emotions.

The shooting and editing are excellent, and the website that accompanies the project is exemplary, giving you information about the earthquake, about ‘humanitarianism’ and emergency relief efforts, and about the film. The companion blog Haiti-today goes in depth into the reconstruction effort, and there is also an interactive component to the site, where you can play the role of a victim, a journalist or a relief worker. I asked Tobi Elliott who helps me with this blog to try it out. Her comments in a few days.

Watch TVO’s Inside Disaster Haiti online here.

Broadcast times:

The last two episodes of the three-part series continue until this Friday, with re-broadcasts listed below:

Part II: Relief
Thursday, January 13 at 12:01 AM ET

Part III: Recovery
Thursday, January 13 at 9:01 PM ET
& Friday, January 14 at 12:01 AM ET

TVO will then repeat the series in Prime Time on
three consecutive Wednesdays at 9 pm:

Wednesday, January 26 (ep 1)
Wednesday, February 2 (ep 2)
Wednesday, February 9 (ep 3)

SCN will be airing the series in Saskatchewan Sunday, Jan 16, 23 and 30 at 8:00pm & again at 10:00pm

Thanks to Tobi Elliott for her help with this blog.

More on Inspiration: my mother Kerstin

Kerstin - In MemoriumKerstin - In Memorium 2Kerstin - In Memorium 3

I find it interesting that I sometimes get very positive response to blog items which are more personal. A while back I wrote about the visual artists in my family as a source of inspiration: my father Arne, who died a few months ago, my uncle Torsten, my sister Eva.

But another big influence was undoubtedly my mother Kerstin, who passed away a year ago. This is an excerpt from a short text I wrote about her for the funeral. For those of you who have seen my films – or who read my blog – the connections to my work are pretty obvious.

Kerstin - In Memorium 4

Kerstin was a renaissance person, and a citizen of the world. The former in the sense that she was intensely interested in everything: family and society, nature and culture; cooking just as much as history and philosophy; the trees outside the window as much as religion and literature.

To her everyday life she gave a sense of style and elegance, but that was only part of her reality, because culture was her life. Sometimes she reminded me of my experiences with some Native Americans who don’t make a hard distinction between reality and myth – for them, the two merge into one universe where the mythological creatures are just as real as the neighbours in the village.

Kerstin’s world was largely populated by artists and authors, composers and actors – some of whom she had actually met and known personally – but actually the others seemed just as real, and her relationship to them was just as meaningful. Faced with some day-to-day problem she was just as content to discuss it with Herman Hesse or Susan Sontag, as with a friend or family member.

She also had very vivid memories of people she had met, and kept them alive in her memory. In this way, she was never alone, although of course she lived by herself since we were children. And we must not forget the music: it was an important part of her world. That she should have chosen the music for her funeral is perfectly logical, and when you listen to it, Bach and psalms, folk and popular music, it reminds you of the range of her interests.

She was a citizen of the world in at least two ways. Her cultural interests knew no borders. She had vivid memories from her many trips abroad. She read in English and French, and until her last months she was still looking up words and learning new expressions. She read other literature in translation. It was always fun to talk to her when the Royal Swedish Academy had made its decision for the Nobel Prize. It was rare that they would decide on an author with whose work Kerstin was not familiar, and she always had her opinion about their choice.

She also followed world politics, not just with interest but with a constant concern for the best ways to solve problems and resolve issues. I was amazed that she never tired of this or gave up. Until her last weeks, even in the hospital, she wanted her daily paper. It was important for her to keep track of new developments and to make up her mind about them. Every conversation with Kerstin, even on the phone, moved quickly from family matters to culture and world politics.

Kerstin’s profession involved working with children, usually children with learning difficulties. In her archives, many folders and binders with course plans, certificates and childrens’ drawings attest to the quality of her work in this domain. Other teachers who worked with her saw her as an example.

As adults, many of her former students have spoken of her particular way of taking children seriously. Just one example: my older daughter Anna once said to me: “Can you believe this, Grandma just asked me if hip hop music is progressive. How old is she anyway?” Well, she was in her mid-seventies at the time, and even at that age she could make the rest of us feel intellectually lazy.

I will always think of Kerstin with gratitude and admiration.

Thanks to Tobi Elliott for her help with this blog.

Happy (stress-free) holidays!

Bigger presents from Haiti
Items from my present cupboard

I just wrote a very serious blog post, but I decided to save it til after the holiday season. I can see that people are in a party mood, which is a good thing. Even though Christmas and New Year’s come in well after Halloween and Valentine’s in my own Holiday ratings, it is a good time to see family and friends.

What’s not so good is the shopping Frenzy out there. With Canadian’s personal indebtedness at an all-time high, do we need to spend a lot more money on a lot more stuff? And do we need the stress of near-impossible parking and shopping mall line-ups?

In my Swedish family, present-giving has always been important. My mother, for one, always made beautiful packages for carefully chosen books or home-made textiles, a tradition now kept up by my sister Eva.

I like giving presents too, but I can’t stand Christmas shopping, and I have a system to avoid it. It’s the Present Cupboard. (Comes in handy for birthdays too.) All year, as I travel – or even just walk around town – I keep my eyes open for good presents. Although I won’t turn down a good sale with reduced prices, I have a big preference for buying things directly from people who make them, so I know where the money is going.

Small presents from Haiti
Inexpensive presents: the wrecked-car key rings on the right are from ATSA - the subject of my film Art en Action. You can find other presents on their website.

It seems to me this is more important than ever these days when arts and crafts are under attack from governments. If you buy something from a local artist or artisan, you are helping them stay alive and keep doing what they do best. There are also the special stores which sell fair trade presents, a great way to support cooperatives in poor countries. Many NGOs also sell fair-trade presents on-line.

And then there are great ways to contribute to good causes around the world, and ear-marking your donation as a present for a friend. This is mostly what I’ll do this year, because this has been such a terrible year for the people of Haiti.

So I will buy most of my ‘presents’ from Doctors Without Borders – you can buy cholera medicine, or pay for a day’s salary for a nurse or doctor. And I’ll make a contribution to Democracy Now!, for its great alternative news coverage totally independent of the multinational corporations who own most of the other media. ATSA is another excellent (and local!) group of engaged artists and citizens.

Boring, too ‘politically correct,’ moralistic? Some commentators in the mainstream media think so. If you asked the doctors on the frontlines in areas stricken by disaster, I think there perspective would be different.

Joyeuses fêtes!

God Jul och Gott Nytt År!

Feliz Navidad!

Happy holidays to all!

Thanks to Tobi Elliott for her help with this blog.

The Yes Men bring the house down

This week I went to a sensational Cinema Politica screening at Concordia University here in Montreal.

Cinema Politica is now, according to programmer Ezra Winton, the biggest community- and campus-based documentary screening network in the world! And Concordia, its home base and launching pad, continues to be the scene of weekly screenings often attended by more than 500 people – quite an achievement!

This time, after several years of efforts, Winton and CP Director Svetla Turnin had succeeded in bringing the Yes-Men to Montreal. Do you know who they are? They are surely the world’s leading impostors of the serious-humorous kind. They have pulled off some incredible hoaxes, and always at the expense of governments and corporations who should have reasons to be ashamed of their doings.

The Yes-Men modus operandi is to create false websites which lead people to invite them to conferences as representatives of the ‘bad guys.’ Once there, they push the envelope, taking corporate and government strategies to absurd levels, announcing outrageous schemes. The most incredible thing about their stunts is that people usually take them seriously, even when they propose, for example, human remains as a new energy source or human waste as a protein source for the poor.

On behalf of Dow chemicals, they apologized for the Union Carbide disaster in Bhopal and promised compensation for the victims. They got terrific coverage on BBC news around the globe, forcing DOW (the new owner of the UC assets) to strenuously deny that they had done something good! The Concordia crowd saw these feats in the film The Yes Men Fix the World, produced by Andy Bichlbaum and Mike Bonnano themselves, as a follow-up to the 2003 film The Yes Men.

I found the film a little uneven but full of brilliant ideas. For example, some arch-conservative U.S. climate-change deniers and free-market apostles are shot against a blue screen and are asked what they would like to see as a background for themselves. They then take the interviewees’ suggestions to heart, in their own humorous fashion, and use the backdrops as an ironic backdrop to their comments. Talk about giving people the rope to hang themselves. And most of all, the footage of the Yes Men’s stunts is priceless.

The Yes Men

In the discussion afterward, Andy and Mike (actually Jacques Servin and Igor Vamos) explained that they are anti-capitalist, that they take advantage of opportunities to expose fraud and ill-doing, that they haven’t generally had problems with lawsuits, and that they encourage people everywhere to follow their example.

In response to the many activists who inevitably wanted to know if they had done something on their pet issue, they gave the sound advice: why don’t you do it yourselves!

Congrats to Cinema Politica for an exceptional last-screening-of-the-year!

Cinema Politica crowd at Concordia

With thanks to Tobi Elliott for her help with this blog. Photo credit: Thanh Pham

Wearing two hats

Mukash, Isacsson & Sioui-Labelle
Myself and DOP René Sioui-Labelle shooting Power at Hudson’s Bay in the early 90s interviewing Cree chief Matthew Mukash.

Film students sometimes ask theoretical questions which, while not uninteresting, are not particularly important to a practitioner. But Tom Eden from the documentary program in Rivière du Loup asked me this: is it a good idea to direct and to do camera and sound at the same time?

This is a big question, and I could write a book about it. Some pioneers of cinéma vérité did their own camera work (Pennebaker) or sound (Wiseman). Some of my colleagues whose work I admire do their own camera work: John Walker, Martin Duckworth, Ali Kazimi… and I do my own sound – as did one filmmaker who really inspired me, Barbara Kopple.

I think some of us took this approach years ago because we wanted to have a small crew and also to maximize the number of shooting days (by spending less money per shooting day.) But the combination of reduced budgets and accessible digital technologies have really brought this way of working to the fore.

These days there are filmmakers who do everything themselves – one example is Montreal filmmaker Eve Lamont, who just released a film on prostitution (L’Imposture), which she directed while doing camera and sound herself. An impressive achievement, considering some of the situations involved several different characters, sometimes in uncontrolled environments.

The other day I saw a very good film, Gasland (shortlisted for the Oscars) shot by the filmmaker – but the shooting is pretty awful. What saves the film is the personal narrative tone, the investigation and the excellent editing. Imagine if it had been well shot as well!

For me, doing camera work would have come naturally, as I have a background in visual arts and photography. But I have chosen to do sound because I find that it allows me to have a better overview of what’s going on, looking around to see what else is going on outside of the frame.

So… doing creative tech work while directing has many advantages, primarily reducing the size of the crew and controlling costs. But here is a caution. Directing really requires your full attention. So does camera work and sound recording. So if you wear two of these hats at the same time, you are inevitably compromising.

If you are on a tight production schedule, something will get less attention. So one key issue is time. Doing camera or sound is great if you know how to do it, and you are not in a rush! Another key is really knowing your gear. (You don’t want to be struggling with tech issues at the crucial moment when you need to reassure your characters, negotiate access, ask a key question…) And your relationship and communications with whoever else is working with you needs to be really tight.

Here is an old photo to show that directing and doing tech work can be fun: myself and DOP James Grey on a beach in Rio during the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.

Rio beach

Thanks to Tobi Elliott for her help with the blog.